Physical Taoism
On the occasion of Trey’s recent un-birthday, I remarked that
he had yet to reach the real milestone, the 60th, which in traditional Taoist, and
Asian cosmology generally, is a significant one. There is a sixty-year cycle based in the wuxing and stem and branch
theory. Before dismissing this as
not germane to the “philosophical” thrust of this blog, please note that I
consider the philosophical/religious distinction somewhat arbitrary, made by
westerners cherry-picking and interpreting the texts and traditions for support
of pre-existing socio-political or personality predispositions. Although there is ritualistic
temple-oriented Taoism, the underlying principles of Tao and the cultural and historical
milieu in which they developed are one (just as western thought and “practice”
is rooted in Greco-Roman, Judeo-Christian attitudes). Although we don’t generally do it, you can make a
distinction, I suppose, between “philosophical” Christianity and “religious”
Christianity, but really only someone outside or sailing against the tradition is
likely to do that.
The 60-year cycle though, to this yin creature, makes sense,
and it suggests to me a physical
Taoism that is referred to in both the “philosophical” and “religious” realms.
Taoists have long been preoccupied with the physical maintenance and condition of
the body to be in balance in the world. For women, the physical connection with
the universe is for most of our life, a chronic condition. One of my first
qigong teachers, a kind and sensitive one-time karate champion, once said,
sympathetically, “It’s hard to be a woman.”
In a post comment earlier about tattoos and Barbie dolls
(strange, the topics that turn up here) I voiced my concern about the early
puberty of girls in westernized culture, even before I read the article (a
recurring theme over the past decade) in the most recent issue of Time
magazine. (There is also some
concern that boys may be subject to early puberty, but it seems less easy to
measure, and I sensed a so-what attitude, “so they ejaculate early, boys will
be boys.”) And, concerning the
other side of the coin, in yet another memoir by one of the hip generation of
women discovering menopause, Sandra Tsing Lo wrote
in the Atlantic that, “all women are different” (from each other, to say
nothing of men)…but suggested that maybe the menopause, generally complete by
60, is a returning to the girls we once were. That is, our reproductive cycling is perhaps the out-of-norm,
not the other way around.
It is my observation, from that yin sensitivity to physical
cycles, that at this certain age, women, and men too, have the opportunity to
return to the personhood we were developing at 12, but which was so rudely
interrupted by the biological destiny thrust upon us by the universe (and now,
too soon, like an artificial climate change phenomenon). Women who found complete
identity in the aspects of this destiny spend their later years in a Joan
Collins drive to stay attractive, cling to younger men, or if of the nurturing
persuasion, obsess on grandchildren, or become social moms, putting notable noble
nurturing energy into community causes.
But some of us may be glad to be rid of that entire identity, still yin,
but returning to the wonder of childhood—learning, exploring, creating, and
playing with the energy of a 10-year-old, albeit with five decades of acquired
wisdom and experience, to use or abandon.
I recently have taken up the paintbrush, a Chinese one, and
have been drawing and painting with abandon and fervor, in the way I once did before
I “became a woman,” like a girl with her crayons, spending whole rainy
afternoons in artistic play. Had I
been encouraged—an interesting word, to be given the courage—I might have pursued
this passion through my life, like my teacher and friend who paint like magicians
because they’ve been doing it daily for 30 or 40 years.
I also observe in men similar “return” phenomena. Men who
die a week after their retirement or vegetate in the La-z-boy have probably failed
to rediscover who they were before they “became” adult and burdened with worldly
concerns and red dust. Those who
do, tend to become the pre-adolescents they once were, clever and exploring, or
preoccupied with toys and torment.
There is a tradition in certain Taoist sects (and other
spiritual traditions too) to retreat after 60, to turn inward to develop that
part of ourselves that we lost in the hormonal shift called growing up. That’s one reason for maintaining
health and energy. It is too bad
that today’s children may be experiencing that moment too soon. I only hope they can live long enough
to complete the cycle of return and enjoy the spring of their lives once again. We who aspire to Tao-based lives often
talk about being childlike, returning to that less-carved state of wonder and
innocence. But perhaps only after
we achieve a certain age, can we really accomplish that.
“Things grow and
flourish and then go back to their root.” (TTC v. 16 tr. Joseph Hsu.)
5 comments:
That early onset of puberty in girls is why Gilda's been drinking organic milk since forever. If she still start puberty early, I will be PISSED - both because organic milk costs a fortune, and because it's not nearly as delicious and "milky" as regular milk.
I, however, have always wished for early menopause. No more period? Hello!
Yes, 60 is the age of tao, or the original face you were born with. Any age is the age of tao, really, but the cares of the world have taken us away. Nevertheless for those who have been in touch with tao all along , 60 or not means no difference - to themselves i.e. The only difference between those who remember and those who don't is that the former remain as fresh as the day they were born. And while in the world and part taking of its joys and sorrows and they are themselves the joys and the sorrows, they they are as if not, yet are. Because tao just is. Well put baroness!
Thanks for reposting your submissions here, I may have missed it otherwise.
For a site whose contributers and commenters have been overwhelmingly male, it's nice to see a female perspective added to the mix; especially one who's actually been to China and studied with traditional Taoists, rather than relying purely on books and personal conjecture. You'll add a lot to the conversation, I'm sure. I look forward to reading more.
Thank you all for your interest and support.
Of course OM is right, however many people in the west in any case, have been so out of touch with Tao for so long they can't see the simple when it's right in front of their original face. I had a real "conversion" in my 60th years, having studied this stuff for some years, but it probably wasn't until I was in Wudang that it became clear.
AS always, I appreciate my faithful and patient readers!
Very interesting post. Not sure that one has to wait until they are 60, but perhaps in retirement, yes, it could be easier, if for nothing else because there's more time for it ('it' being the inner life, creativity, etc)
I also appreciate the repost: Rambling Taoist has so many post and I don't always have time to check in there, things get missed.
Post a Comment